Changing the Course Allocation Mechanism at Wharton

نویسندگان

  • Eric Budish
  • Judd B. Kessler
  • Stephen Leider
  • Paul Milgrom
  • Muriel Niederle
  • Jesse Shapiro
چکیده

This paper reports on an experiment conducted at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, testing a new mechanism for matching students to schedules of courses. The experiment compared Budish’s (2011) approximate competitive equilibrium from equal incomes (CEEI) to the incumbent, a fake-money auction used by Wharton and numerous other professional schools. CEEI outperformed the auction on quantitative measures of efficiency and fairness and qualitative measures of perceived strategic simplicity and student satisfaction. The experiment succeeded in the Roth (1986) sense of “whispering in the ears of princes”, persuading the Wharton administration to adopt CEEI and guiding real-world implementation. Keywords: Market Design, Experiments, Matching, Assignment, Combinatorial Allocation Problems JEL Codes: D47 (Market Design), C9 (Experiments), C78 (Matching Theory) * The authors thank Gerard Cachon, without whom this study would never have been possible, and The Wharton School, in particular the Course Allocation Redesign Team and Wharton Computing. We thank Adriaan Ten Kate and Xan Vongsathorn for excellent RA work. We also thank Clayton Featherstone, Emir Kamenica, Stephen Leider, Paul Milgrom, Muriel Niederle, Jesse Shapiro, and Alvin Roth, as well as seminar participants at Boston University, the Stony Brook Workshop on Experimental Game Theory, ESA Santa Cruz, University of Michigan, Stanford, Wharton, and NBER Market Design. Disclosure: The CEEI mechanism is in the public domain. The software implementation of the CEEI mechanism was funded by and is owned by Wharton, which has branded the mechanism as “Course Match.” If Wharton licenses the Course Match software to other institutions and revenues exceed a threshold, then a royalty will accrue to a market design research lab that will be overseen by Eric Budish. Wharton had no right of prior review of the results of the present study. † Budish: Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, [email protected] ‡ Kessler: The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, [email protected]

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Can "Complex" Market Designs Make it from Theory to Practice? Changing the Course Allocation Mechanism at Wharton

Budish (2011) proposes a new mechanism for the problem of combinatorial assignment -e.g., assigning students to schedules of courses -called approximate competitive equilibrium from equal incomes (CEEI). While the CEEI mechanism satisfies attractive properties of efficiency, fairness, and incentives, it is “complicated” in several ways that one might reasonably wonder whether the theory could a...

متن کامل

Course Match: A Large-Scale Implementation of Approximate Competitive Equilibrium from Equal Incomes for Combinatorial Allocation

Copyright: © 2016 The Author(s) Abstract. Combinatorial allocation involves assigning bundles of items to agents when the use of money is not allowed. Course allocation is one common application of combinatorial allocation, in which the bundles are schedules of courses and the assignees are students. Existing mechanisms used in practice have been shown to have serious flaws, which lead to alloc...

متن کامل

Experiments as a Bridge from Market Design Theory to Market Design Practice: Changing the Course Allocation Mechanism at Wharton

This paper reports on an experimental test of a new market design that is attractive in theory but without direct precedent and ―complex‖ in ways that question its suitability for practice. These challenges led to a novel experimental design that used real market participants, tested their ability to accurately report complex preferences, and searched for unintended consequences the theory migh...

متن کامل

A Study of Answer Changing Behavior in MC Tests: The Effect of the Academic Course, Field of Study, Gender and Teachers’ Attitude

This study investigated the answer changing behavior of the Iranian university students and its relationship to the academic course, gender, and field of study. 362 students at the University of Isfahan took part in the study. 76 English language teachers were also surveyed for their attitude toward answer changing on MC tests. The results indicated that 42.11% of the teachers had a negative at...

متن کامل

Joint optimization of pricing and capacity allocation for two competitive airlines under demand uncertainty

Nowadays, airline industries should overcome different barriers regarding the fierce competition and changing consumer behavior. Thus, they attempt to focus on joint decision making which enables them to set pricing and capacity allocation to maximize their profits. In this research, we develop a model to optimize pricing and capacity allocation in a duopoly of single-flight leg for two competi...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2014